Referencias

De CNB
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda
Busca en cnbGuatemala con Google

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
< Anterior   

Alexander, R. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.

Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-y., Reznitskaya, A. y Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1–46.

Asterhan, C. S. C. (2015). Introducing online dialogues in co-located classrooms: If, why, and how. En L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, y S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Asterhan, C. S. C., y Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626-639.

Bloom, B. S., y Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., y Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Chi, M. T., y Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.

Clarke, S. N. (2015). The right to speak. En L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, y S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Ford, M. J., y Forman, E. (2015). Uncertainty and scientific progress in the classroom. En L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, y S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Herrenkohl, L. R., y Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.

Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155–179.

Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., y Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentive reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287–315.

Kuhn, D., y Zillmer, N. (2015). Developing norms of discourse. En L. B. Resnick, C. S. C. Asterhan, y S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Latour, B., y Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mercer, N., y Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.

Mercier, H., Boudry, M., Paglieri, F., y Trouche, E. (2017). Natural-born arguers: teaching how to make the best of our reasoning abilities. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 1-16.

Michaels, S. O’Connor, C., y Williams-Hall, M. C., with Resnick, L. B. (2010). Accountable Talk sourcebook: For classroom conversation that works. Pittsburgh, PA: Institute for Learning, University of Pittsburgh. Disponible en: http://ifl.pitt.edu/index.php/educator_resources/accountable_talk

O’Connor, C., y Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue “dialogic”? Human Development, 50(5), 275–285.

Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.

Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–54.

Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., y Clarke, S. N. (Eds.). (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., y O’Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. En D. Preiss y R. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163–194). New York, NY: Springer.

Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L. J., Clark, A. M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., y Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29–48.

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., y Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049.

Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., y Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.

Topping, K. J., y Trickey, S. (2007). Collaborative philosophical inquiry for schoolchildren: Cognitive gains at 2-year follow-up. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 787–796.

< Anterior